The role of dopamine in value-based attentional orienting. Neurobiology of Disease, 92, 157–165.Īnderson, B. Reward, attention, and HIV-related risk in HIV+ individuals. Test-retest reliability of value-driven attentional capture. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 81, 607–613.Īnderson, B. On the relationship between value-driven and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Collabra Psychology, 4(1), 10.Īnderson, B. Relating attentional biases for stimuli associated with social reward and punishment to autistic traits. Mechanisms of value-learning in the guidance of spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 796–805.Īnderson, B. Mechanisms of habitual approach: Failure to suppress irrelevant responses evoked by previously reward-associated stimuli. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21, 499–506.Īnderson, B. Attentional bias for non-drug reward is magnified in addiction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1636–1642.Īnderson, B. On the distinction between value-driven attention and selection history: Evidence from individuals with depressive symptoms. On the automaticity of attentional orienting to threatening stimuli. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 27–33.Īnderson, B. Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience, 12, 461–467.Īnderson, B. Reward processing in the value-driven attention network: Reward signals tracking cue identity and location. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 140–145.Īnderson, B. Going for it: The economics of automaticity in perception and action. What is abnormal about addiction-related attentional biases? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 167, 8–14.Īnderson, B. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369, 24–39.Īnderson, B. The attention habit: How reward learning shapes attentional selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 750–756.Īnderson, B. Value-driven attentional priority is context specific. Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by spatial context. A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 175, 99–105.Īnderson, B. Selective attention moderates the relationship between attentional capture by signals of nondrug reward and illicit drug use. Overall, the Value-Driven Attention Questionnaire (VDAQ) provides a useful proxy-measure of attention-to-reward that is much more accessible than typical laboratory assessments.Īlbertella, L., Copeland, D., Pearson, D., Watson, P., Wiers, R. Variation in scores on the questionnaire is additionally associated with a distinct biomarker in brain connectivity, and the questionnaire exhibits acceptable test–retest reliability.
In demonstrating this relationship, we also provide evidence that attention-to-reward as measured in the lab, an automatic and implicit bias in information processing, is related to overt behaviors and motivations in everyday life as assessed via the questionnaire. Scores on the questionnaire correlate with other measures known to be related to attention-to-reward and predict performance on multiple laboratory tasks measuring the construct. In the present study, we introduce a questionnaire designed to provide a brief and accessible means of assessing attention-to-reward. Currently, the ability to measure and quantify attention-to-reward is restricted to the use of psychophysical laboratory tasks, which limits research into the construct in a variety of ways. This influence of reward on attention varies substantially across individuals, being related to a variety of personality variables and clinical conditions. Reward history is a powerful determinant of what we pay attention to.
0 kommentar(er)
